All submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated by the editorial team to assess their relevance, originality, and compliance with journal requirements. Manuscripts deemed suitable are then forwarded to a minimum of two independent, expert reviewers, utilizing a double-blind peer-review process. Reviewers evaluate the research's quality, validity, and contribution, offering constructive feedback. Based on these evaluations, the Editor renders a decision regarding acceptance, required revisions, or rejection of the manuscript. Revised manuscripts may undergo further evaluation. All reviews are treated as confidential, and reviewers are expected to adhere to ethical standards, disclose any potential conflicts of interest, and uphold the integrity of the review process.